Description
SpaceX is facing three new AI copyright lawsuits, and the allegations are raising some serious questions about copyright law, fair use, and whether companies are allowed to scan books they legally purchased.
Stris & Maher has now become the law firm representing plaintiffs in more AI copyright lawsuits than any other, with 16 cases including the three new ones against SpaceX. There are now 164 anti-AI lawsuits.
Is scanning a legally purchased book a copyright violation? Does destroying the original physical copy change the fair use analysis? And can copyright holders claim damages based on the supposed market for licensing books to AI training companies?
And didn't a federal judge—not to mention the Supreme Court—already rule on this long ago?
If you by a book, you own it. You should be able to do whatever you want to with it: burn it, shred it, whatever. It's YOUR property.
The big content cartels don't want that. They want to be able to dictate what you can do with your property after you've purchased it!
Stris & Maher takes lead in filing AI copyright suits with 3 new suits (with LOSING strategy) https://chatgptiseatingtheworld.com/2026/11/05/stris-maher-takes-lead-in-filing-ai-copyright-suits-with-3-new-suits-v-elon-musks-company-spacex-superintelligence/
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
🔊Pᴏᴅᴄᴀꜱᴛ: https://podcast.bogosity.tv/
💬Dɪꜱᴄᴏʀᴅ: https://discord.bogosity.tv/
▶️YᴏᴜTᴜʙᴇ: https://www.youtube.com/shanedk
▶️Oᴅʏsᴇᴇ: https://odysee.com/%24/invite/@shanedk:4
▶️Rᴜᴍʙʟᴇ https://rumble.com/c/shanedk
💬Dɪꜱᴄᴏʀᴅ: http://bit.ly/LK-Discord
💰Dᴏɴᴀᴛᴇ ᴏʀ ꜱᴜʙꜱᴄʀɪʙᴇ: https://donate.bogosity.tv
